Vendored the panel's init/LUT/refresh register sequence from three
independent Waveshare reference drivers for this exact panel+controller
(RaspberryPi/c, ESP32, and the ESP32-S3-ePaper-13.3E6 ESP-IDF example),
which all agree byte-for-byte. The epd13in3e.c #error is gone; it
compiles clean and links (verified via /build-firmware ee02).
That vendor code also revealed the panel's SPI wire raster is a native
1200x1600 (portrait), not 1600x1200 as previously assumed -- rotated 90
degrees from the panel's landscape mount/marketing size. The old
assumption wasn't just a rotation bug: 1600x1200 and 1200x1600 don't
share a row stride, so packing at the wrong one would have shredded
images into a repeating diagonal garble on real hardware, not just
displayed them sideways. Fixed with a new PANEL_WIRE_TRANSPOSE in
image_pipeline.py, applied after the existing per-frame
ORIENTATION_TRANSPOSE, with a direction-agnostic regression test that
catches the stride bug specifically (a byte-count check alone can't,
since both orientations pack to the same total size).
A full ee02 build still fails, but no longer because of this driver --
main/{back,next,combo}_button.c call an ESP32-C6-only deep-sleep
GPIO-wakeup API with no ESP32-S3 fallback, a separate pre-existing gap
that was simply hidden behind the panel driver's old #error. See
docs/hardware.md for details; CI's continue-on-error on this board
stays in place until that's fixed too.
Server: Frame.panel_type (new column + migration) is auto-derived from
the device's reported board (X-Frame-Board), never user-set -- the
panel is a property of the hardware, not a picker in the UI.
image_pipeline's packing/render pipeline is parameterized by panel
geometry instead of hardcoded 800x480 globals, with the real confirmed
13.3in geometry (1600x1200) registered alongside the original 7.3in
panel. Existing 7.3in frames are unaffected (column default + board
mapping both resolve to the original panel).
Board identifiers are also renamed (devkit/xiao -> devkit_esp32c6/
xiao_esp32c6, plus new "ee02") since the EE02 board also carries a XIAO
module -- "xiao" alone stopped disambiguating hardware. The server
keeps accepting the legacy bare names indefinitely for already-flashed
devices.
Firmware: scaffolds a third build target (ee02, ESP32-S3 -- a real
chip-target change, not just a same-chip Kconfig variant like xiao) and
a new epd13in3e driver component skeleton. The actual panel init/LUT/
refresh register sequence isn't ported from vendor demo code yet (none
was available), so that component deliberately fails to compile
(#error) rather than risk sending unverified register values to real
hardware -- devkit/xiao are unaffected and build identically to before.
CI's ee02 build step is continue-on-error for the same reason.
tfaour