esp_sleep_enable_gpio_wakeup_on_hp_periph_powerdown() only exists on
ESP32-C6 (SOC_GPIO_SUPPORT_HP_PERIPH_PD_SLEEP_WAKEUP), so the ee02
(ESP32-S3) build failed with implicit-declaration errors in
{back,next,combo}_button.c once the epd13in3e driver's #error stopped
masking it.
Each button file now branches on that capability macro: the C6 path
(devkit/xiao) is untouched, and ESP32-S3 uses
esp_sleep_enable_ext1_wakeup_io() instead. The earlier ext1 attempt was
rejected on C6 hardware because its pull resistor didn't hold across
RTC_PERIPH power-down -- tracing the same path in ESP-IDF source shows
gpio_config()'s pull_up_en already delegates to rtc_gpio_pullup_en()
for RTC-capable pins on every non-original-ESP32 target, so the pull-up
should already survive the same power-down on S3. The _io() variant is
additive, so the three button files don't need cross-file mask
coordination. Also widens the button GPIO Kconfig range for
IDF_TARGET_ESP32S3 (0-21, matching its RTC-IO set) instead of the
C6-shaped 0-7.
Verified: ee02, devkit, and xiao all build clean end-to-end locally
(native ESP-IDF v6.0, no Docker in this sandbox). NOT verified: whether
this actually avoids the spurious-instant-wakeup bug on real EE02
hardware -- that failure mode was only ever confirmed empirically, not
root-caused in a way a compile can check. continue-on-error stays on
in CI's ee02 build step until that's confirmed.
Server: Frame.panel_type (new column + migration) is auto-derived from
the device's reported board (X-Frame-Board), never user-set -- the
panel is a property of the hardware, not a picker in the UI.
image_pipeline's packing/render pipeline is parameterized by panel
geometry instead of hardcoded 800x480 globals, with the real confirmed
13.3in geometry (1600x1200) registered alongside the original 7.3in
panel. Existing 7.3in frames are unaffected (column default + board
mapping both resolve to the original panel).
Board identifiers are also renamed (devkit/xiao -> devkit_esp32c6/
xiao_esp32c6, plus new "ee02") since the EE02 board also carries a XIAO
module -- "xiao" alone stopped disambiguating hardware. The server
keeps accepting the legacy bare names indefinitely for already-flashed
devices.
Firmware: scaffolds a third build target (ee02, ESP32-S3 -- a real
chip-target change, not just a same-chip Kconfig variant like xiao) and
a new epd13in3e driver component skeleton. The actual panel init/LUT/
refresh register sequence isn't ported from vendor demo code yet (none
was available), so that component deliberately fails to compile
(#error) rather than risk sending unverified register values to real
hardware -- devkit/xiao are unaffected and build identically to before.
CI's ee02 build step is continue-on-error for the same reason.
tfaour