6c2afeba786667698b80b9ac563342397d40ffcb
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Thomas Faour
|
14c47aa2a0 |
Let a tasks widget merge multiple task lists, checkbox+color like calendar
Tasks widgets could only ever point at one CalDAV task list (a radio- button picker, owner-only). Now they merge any number of included task lists across every linked user, same checkbox-inclusion + optional pinned-color shape a calendar widget already has for its calendars -- FrameTaskList mirrors FrameCalendar exactly, down to the same owner- adds/anyone-mutes permission split (api_widget_task_list_select/ api_widget_task_list_color). Reused calendar_render._event_colors/ _draw_color_bar as-is for the per-task color bar -- a task dict's owner_display_name/color_index is exactly that function's single- source fallback shape. Also added an opt-in "show tasks completed in the last 24 hours" toggle (TaskWidgetConfig.show_completed): caldav_client.fetch_tasks now accepts a completed_since cutoff and returns completed VTODOs (with their completion time) instead of silently dropping them, and _draw_tasks gives a completed task a filled checkbox + muted text instead of the normal empty-box/due-date row. Migration 18 splits the single-source TaskWidgetConfig columns (added by 17, splitting tasks out of the calendar widget in the first place) into frame_task_lists, carrying forward each widget's existing single source as its first included list -- same shape migration 9 used carrying forward frame_calendars' old single opt-in. Verified live in the browser (desktop + mobile): the new "Included task lists" + "Recently completed" dialog sections, the show_completed toggle actually persisting through a real HTTP round-trip, and no regression in the calendar widget's own "Included calendars" dialog. Full suite (192 tests, including new merge_tasks/config_save/migration coverage) passes. |
||
|
Thomas Faour
|
b5c52004c8 |
Split the tasks feature out of the calendar widget into its own widget type
Task lists used to be a week-view-only sub-feature bolted onto calendar widgets (CalendarWidgetConfig.tasks_*), so a task list could only exist tied to a calendar's view and only inside its footprint. Tasks are now a standalone widget type (TaskWidgetConfig, app/widgets/tasks.py) that can be placed and sized independently, same as photos/calendar/ whiteboard -- no separate "enabled" flag either, since being on the grid at all is the on/off switch, matching every other widget type. Migration 17 creates task_widget_configs, extracts any existing calendar widget's configured task source into a new sibling tasks widget (auto-placed in open grid space, source dropped+logged if truly none is left), then drops calendar_widget_configs' now-dead tasks_* columns in the same migration -- this project's usual same-migration- drop convention. Also handles the rarer case of a database jumping straight from before the widget system existed to after this split in one boot, via the legacy Frame.calendar_tasks_* columns. Verified live in the browser at desktop and mobile widths: adding a Tasks widget, its own dialog (task-list source picker + preview), and confirming the calendar widget's dialog no longer mentions tasks at all. Full test suite (180 tests, including new coverage for the widget render/actions, the migration's data-extraction path, and the permission-boundary shape for tasks-source) passes. |
||
 tfaour
|
a33a3a71e4 |
Widget system Phase 4b: per-widget gear-icon config dialogs
Replaces the Photos/Calendar/Whiteboard tabs with a single Layout page
(now the frame's landing route) where each widget gets a gear icon
opening a dialog scoped to that specific widget's own settings. This
was the missing piece for genuinely independent same-type widgets --
"the Calendar tab" never made sense once a frame could hold more than
one calendar widget with different settings.
Data layer: FrameCalendar re-keyed from frame_id to widget_id, so each
calendar widget has its own independent included-calendars set. The
rekey runs as an unconditional post-startup step (like the existing
widget backfill), not a numbered migration -- it depends on calendar
widgets already existing, which themselves come from that same
backfill step, not from schema migration. Registering it as a numbered
migration would have run it first during a real upgrade, silently
dropping every row; caught by a new test that exercises the raw-SQL
upgrade path instead of the fresh-install create_all() shortcut every
other migration test takes.
API layer: every endpoint that used to assume "the frame's widget of
this type" (photo queue/thumbnail/preview, calendar select/color/
tasks/weather, whiteboard source/browse/preview) moved into
api_widgets.py under /api/frames/{id}/widgets/{widget_id}/..., with a
new require_widget_view/control dependency pair mirroring the existing
frame-level ones. Device status (battery/last-seen/firmware) got its
own frame-level /status endpoint, split out of the old photo-specific
/queue it used to piggyback on -- fixes the status bar going silently
blank on any frame without a photo widget.
UI layer: each widget type's existing settings markup/JS was ported
into a dialog partial + an explicit init/close function pair (the
content is now fetched and injected on demand, not loaded at page load
time). window.FRAME_API is repointed to the open dialog's widget-scoped
API base for its duration and restored on close; a separate
window.FRAME_BASE_API stays stable for the always-present header/
status-bar scripts.
Caught during manual browser testing: the consolidated config-save
endpoint initially expected a JSON body while the copied-over dialog JS
posts form-urlencoded data (the old convention) -- fixed to match, with
new HTTP-level test coverage that would have caught it immediately.
|
||
|
tfaour
|
37bd657299 |
Widget system Phase 2: full cutover to widget-based rendering
device.py's mode-keyed dispatch is replaced by a real compositor: load a frame's widgets, compute pixel rects via app/grid.py, render each through its widget module, and composite with render_panel. Physical NEXT/BACK buttons now execute each frame's assigned FrameButtonAction rows instead of one hardcoded per-mode action. api_frames.py, manage.py, and common.py's build_manage_content are repointed to read/write the frame's widget config rows instead of the old Frame columns, and every settings page (Photos/Calendar/ Whiteboard tabs) now pre-fills its form from the same widget config the write endpoints actually save to -- previously the read and write sides would have silently diverged. The old mode selector and photo-inlay checkbox are removed along with their now-inert wiring; arbitrary widget placement subsumes what the fixed inlay split did. Ships together with Phase 1 (per-type render/action modules) since splitting the read/write cutover across deploys would have left settings changes with no visible effect. |
||
|
tfaour
|
31adc34a19 |
Add a real pytest suite, gating the CI build
64 tests covering: auth/setup and the CSRF gate, the "owner adds their own data, anyone linked can mute it" permission pattern shared across calendar-select/tasks-source/whiteboard-source, migration correctness (fresh install, idempotent re-run, expected columns), battery estimate outlier rejection, calendar_feed's fetch/merge/partial-failure handling, webdav_client's fetch/list-directory, the whiteboard force-refresh throttle bypass and browse endpoint, and render-size invariants across calendar views/orientations. No DB/HTTP fixtures need Docker, Node, or a real Immich/CalDAV/WebDAV server -- a fresh temp SQLite file plus a couple of small local HTTP servers as test doubles cover it all. Table data is wiped and reseeded between tests rather than relying on SQLAlchemy's transaction-rollback isolation pattern, which needs a pysqlite event-listener workaround app/db.py's engine doesn't have and has no reason to gain just for tests. Wired into .gitea/workflows/server-docker-build.yml as its own job that build-and-push now depends on, so a failing suite blocks the image push rather than just running alongside it for show. |