Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
tfaour 474b92a282 Add server-side support for a second panel (13.3in Spectra 6 / EE02) and scaffold its firmware target
Build and push server image / test (push) Successful in 45s
Firmware build check / build-check (push) Successful in 2m50s
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 4m36s
Build and push server image / deploy (push) Failing after 1m34s
Server: Frame.panel_type (new column + migration) is auto-derived from
the device's reported board (X-Frame-Board), never user-set -- the
panel is a property of the hardware, not a picker in the UI.
image_pipeline's packing/render pipeline is parameterized by panel
geometry instead of hardcoded 800x480 globals, with the real confirmed
13.3in geometry (1600x1200) registered alongside the original 7.3in
panel. Existing 7.3in frames are unaffected (column default + board
mapping both resolve to the original panel).

Board identifiers are also renamed (devkit/xiao -> devkit_esp32c6/
xiao_esp32c6, plus new "ee02") since the EE02 board also carries a XIAO
module -- "xiao" alone stopped disambiguating hardware. The server
keeps accepting the legacy bare names indefinitely for already-flashed
devices.

Firmware: scaffolds a third build target (ee02, ESP32-S3 -- a real
chip-target change, not just a same-chip Kconfig variant like xiao) and
a new epd13in3e driver component skeleton. The actual panel init/LUT/
refresh register sequence isn't ported from vendor demo code yet (none
was available), so that component deliberately fails to compile
(#error) rather than risk sending unverified register values to real
hardware -- devkit/xiao are unaffected and build identically to before.
CI's ee02 build step is continue-on-error for the same reason.
2026-08-04 20:08:22 +00:00
Thomas Faour b5c52004c8 Split the tasks feature out of the calendar widget into its own widget type
Build and push server image / test (push) Successful in 24s
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m1s
Build and push server image / deploy (push) Successful in 56s
Task lists used to be a week-view-only sub-feature bolted onto calendar
widgets (CalendarWidgetConfig.tasks_*), so a task list could only exist
tied to a calendar's view and only inside its footprint. Tasks are now
a standalone widget type (TaskWidgetConfig, app/widgets/tasks.py) that
can be placed and sized independently, same as photos/calendar/
whiteboard -- no separate "enabled" flag either, since being on the
grid at all is the on/off switch, matching every other widget type.

Migration 17 creates task_widget_configs, extracts any existing
calendar widget's configured task source into a new sibling tasks
widget (auto-placed in open grid space, source dropped+logged if truly
none is left), then drops calendar_widget_configs' now-dead tasks_*
columns in the same migration -- this project's usual same-migration-
drop convention. Also handles the rarer case of a database jumping
straight from before the widget system existed to after this split in
one boot, via the legacy Frame.calendar_tasks_* columns.

Verified live in the browser at desktop and mobile widths: adding a
Tasks widget, its own dialog (task-list source picker + preview), and
confirming the calendar widget's dialog no longer mentions tasks at
all. Full test suite (180 tests, including new coverage for the widget
render/actions, the migration's data-extraction path, and the
permission-boundary shape for tasks-source) passes.
2026-07-25 02:11:45 +00:00
tfaour f48daa71c8 Widget system Phase 1: per-type render/action modules
Build and push server image / test (push) Successful in 17s
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m2s
New app/widgets/ package (photos.py, calendar.py, whiteboard.py, plus
the WIDGET_TYPES registry) -- the widget-system analogue of
routers/device.py's old RENDERERS/ADVANCE_RENDERERS/BACK_RENDERERS,
generalized from "one mode owns the whole panel" to "each widget renders
into its own region and responds to named button actions." Each module
exposes render(db, frame, widget, target_w, target_h) -> Image.Image
(never raises -- a widget's own fetch hiccup falls back to a small
placeholder rather than taking the whole panel's render down) and an
ACTIONS registry for NEXT/BACK button assignment.

Supporting changes needed to give the widget modules something to call,
all mechanical/behavior-preserving for every existing caller:

- image_pipeline.py: render_panel(regions, ...) generalizes render_frame's
  tail (paste, enhance once, overlay once, quantize once, pack once) from
  one photo to N regions -- not a restructuring, since calendar mode's
  photo-inlay feature already pastes a second composed image onto the
  canvas before that single shared pipeline runs.
- photo_queue.py: advance_forced/back_forced/remove_from_rotation/
  get_current take an explicit `frame` param now that `cfg` won't always
  be the Frame itself once photo-queue state moves to PhotoWidgetConfig
  -- caught a real latent bug while doing this: get_current was reading
  refresh_interval_s off `cfg`, but that's a frame-level wake-cadence
  setting, not something that becomes per-widget, so it now reads that
  off `frame` explicitly instead.
- routers/common.py: list_assets/fetch_source_and_faces take album_id/
  display_mode directly instead of a whole Frame (both only ever read
  that one attribute off it); new get_or_refresh_*_for_widget siblings
  of the existing calendar/weather/tasks/whiteboard cache helpers, read/
  writing the new per-widget config tables -- the Frame-scoped originals
  are untouched and still what routers/device.py's actual dispatch calls
  until the Phase 2 cutover.

26 new tests (95 total): render_panel size/placement/orientation
coverage, and per-widget-type render/action tests (unconfigured ->
placeholder, a fetch failure -> placeholder not a crash, actions mutate
the right state). Full suite passes; diff-reviewed to confirm
device.py's actual RENDERERS dispatch and the old Frame-scoped
get_or_refresh_* bodies are unchanged, so this is safe to deploy on its
own despite being step 1 of a two-step cutover (see the project plan on
why the *next* step, not this one, has to ship atomically).
2026-07-24 08:44:53 -04:00
tfaour 31adc34a19 Add a real pytest suite, gating the CI build
Build and push server image / test (push) Successful in 1m18s
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m12s
64 tests covering: auth/setup and the CSRF gate, the "owner adds their
own data, anyone linked can mute it" permission pattern shared across
calendar-select/tasks-source/whiteboard-source, migration correctness
(fresh install, idempotent re-run, expected columns), battery estimate
outlier rejection, calendar_feed's fetch/merge/partial-failure handling,
webdav_client's fetch/list-directory, the whiteboard force-refresh
throttle bypass and browse endpoint, and render-size invariants across
calendar views/orientations.

No DB/HTTP fixtures need Docker, Node, or a real Immich/CalDAV/WebDAV
server -- a fresh temp SQLite file plus a couple of small local HTTP
servers as test doubles cover it all. Table data is wiped and reseeded
between tests rather than relying on SQLAlchemy's transaction-rollback
isolation pattern, which needs a pysqlite event-listener workaround
app/db.py's engine doesn't have and has no reason to gain just for tests.

Wired into .gitea/workflows/server-docker-build.yml as its own job that
build-and-push now depends on, so a failing suite blocks the image push
rather than just running alongside it for show.
2026-07-23 18:51:54 -04:00