Files
espresso_frame/server/render-service
tfaour 644fdefa66
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Failing after 1m10s
Add whiteboard frame mode (Nextcloud Whiteboard / Excalidraw over WebDAV)
New third mode alongside photos/calendar: fetches a .whiteboard file
over plain WebDAV (Basic auth -- generic, not Nextcloud-specific) and
renders it via a small Node.js sidecar using Excalidraw's own real
export code (@excalidraw/utils + @resvg/resvg-js, no headless browser),
since a .whiteboard file turns out to be Excalidraw scene JSON, not an
image. The sidecar runs as a second process inside this same container
(Dockerfile installs Node, start.sh backgrounds it before exec'ing
uvicorn) rather than a separate docker-compose service -- lightweight,
stateless, reachable only at 127.0.0.1 from the Python process, nothing
worth independently scaling.

The rendered PNG is treated exactly like a photo from there on --
composed/quantized through the existing image_pipeline (letterboxed,
never cropped) rather than a second parallel rendering pipeline.

WebDAV credentials support the common "it's actually the same Nextcloud
account as my CalDAV" case (an explicit opt-in checkbox, not silently
inferred) while still working with any WebDAV server generically.
Frame-level source (URL + owning account) follows the same owner-
controls-their-own-data permission split as calendar sources and the
week view's task list: only the account owner can point a frame at it,
anyone linked can clear it.

Honest limitation: this environment has no Node.js/npm, so
render-service/ is written carefully against each library's documented
API (verified via the npm registry, including transitive dependency
licenses after the CalDAV/AGPL surprise earlier this session) but has
never actually been executed. First real docker build is the first
true test -- see render-service/README.md.
2026-07-23 17:02:08 -04:00
..

whiteboard-render

Local sidecar for whiteboard frame mode -- see server.js's own header comment for the full "why Node, why not a headless browser" reasoning. Not an independently deployed service: it runs as a second process inside the main server's container (../Dockerfile installs Node, ../start.sh launches this in the background before exec-ing uvicorn), reachable only at 127.0.0.1:3001 from the Python process in that same container.

Not runtime-tested against a real npm install during development -- this environment had no Node.js/npm available, only the npm registry API (used to verify the dependency versions/licenses in package.json actually exist and resolve). The code is written carefully against each library's documented API (@excalidraw/utils's exportToSvg, @resvg/resvg-js's Resvg class), but the first real build (docker compose build) is the first time this has actually executed end to end. If something's off, docker compose logs will show it -- most likely candidates are exportToSvg's actual return type (string vs. DOM element -- handled defensively, see server.js) or a font-rendering quirk, not a wrong API shape.

Local development (if you have Node 20.19+/22.13+ installed)

cd render-service
npm install
npm start          # listens on 127.0.0.1:3001
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:3001/render \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"elements": [], "width": 800}' \
  -o /tmp/test.png  # an empty scene -- just checks the service comes up and returns a valid PNG