Files
espresso_frame/server/tests/test_device_widget_dispatch.py
T
tfaour a48c84ed4a
Build and push server image / test (push) Successful in 40s
Build and push server image / build-and-push (push) Failing after 1m57s
Build and push server image / deploy (push) Has been skipped
Render widgets concurrently instead of one at a time
A layout with several network-backed widgets (photos, weather,
calendar) paid their fetch latency serially in one /frame/* request,
which could exceed the firmware's fixed HTTP timeout and show a false
"server failed" status screen even though the server was still
working -- most visibly on the hold-triggered "cycle layouts" action,
which swaps in a whole new, cold-started widget set. Each widget now
renders on its own DB session in a thread pool (a plain Session isn't
thread-safe to share, but the per-frame threading.Lock in
frame_locked/widget_locked already made this kind of concurrency safe
by design -- see app/db.py); regions are still collected in
sort_order so overlapping widgets paint in the same z-order as before.
2026-07-28 03:40:07 +00:00

194 lines
8.2 KiB
Python

"""End-to-end HTTP tests for the widget-system cutover in
routers/device.py -- /frame/image, /frame/advance, and /frame/back
against real widget rows (via the migration-backfilled frame #1, or a
purpose-built second frame), a real TestClient, real
render_panel/compose_into. Only Immich itself is mocked (monkeypatched
at the app.widgets.photos module boundary, same pattern as
test_widgets_photos.py) -- everything else in the pipeline is real.
This is the one place in the suite that actually exercises
routers/device.py's dispatch over HTTP; the render-size-invariant tests
exercise the renderers directly, and the widget unit tests exercise
app/widgets/*.py directly, but neither proves device.py's own wiring
(the compositor, the button-action runner, the manage-overlay hookup)
is correct -- that's what this file is for."""
from __future__ import annotations
import time
from app import widgets
from app.models import (
CalendarWidgetConfig,
Frame,
FrameButtonAction,
PhotoWidgetConfig,
Widget,
)
EXPECTED_BYTES = 800 * 480 // 2
_ASSETS = [{"id": "asset-1"}, {"id": "asset-2"}, {"id": "asset-3"}]
def _mock_immich(monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "immich_client_for", lambda frame: object())
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "list_assets", lambda client, album_id: _ASSETS)
from PIL import Image
source = Image.new("RGB", (100, 80), (10, 20, 30))
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "fetch_source_and_faces", lambda client, mode, asset_id: (source, None))
def test_unclaimed_frame_shows_placeholder(client, db_session):
frame = db_session.get(Frame, 1)
frame.owner_user_id = None
db_session.commit()
resp = client.get("/frame/image")
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
def test_claimed_frame_with_unconfigured_photo_widget_still_renders(client, db_session):
client.post("/setup", data={"username": "alice", "password": "hunter22"})
resp = client.get("/frame/image")
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
frame = db_session.get(Frame, 1)
widget = db_session.query(Widget).filter_by(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos").one()
cfg = db_session.get(PhotoWidgetConfig, widget.id)
assert cfg.album_id == "" # never configured -- still rendered fine, as a placeholder region
def test_configured_photo_widget_renders_and_advances_via_button(client, db_session, monkeypatch):
client.post("/setup", data={"username": "alice", "password": "hunter22"})
frame = db_session.get(Frame, 1)
widget = db_session.query(Widget).filter_by(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos").one()
cfg = db_session.get(PhotoWidgetConfig, widget.id)
cfg.album_id = "album-1"
db_session.commit()
_mock_immich(monkeypatch)
resp = client.get("/frame/image")
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
db_session.refresh(cfg)
assert cfg.current_asset_id == "asset-1"
resp = client.post("/frame/advance")
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
db_session.refresh(cfg)
assert cfg.current_asset_id != "asset-1" # the default next->advance binding fired
resp = client.post("/frame/back")
assert resp.status_code == 200
db_session.refresh(cfg)
assert cfg.current_asset_id == "asset-1" # back undid it
def test_manage_flag_still_returns_a_valid_image(client, db_session, monkeypatch):
client.post("/setup", data={"username": "alice", "password": "hunter22"})
frame = db_session.get(Frame, 1)
widget = db_session.query(Widget).filter_by(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos").one()
db_session.get(PhotoWidgetConfig, widget.id).album_id = "album-1"
db_session.commit()
_mock_immich(monkeypatch)
plain = client.get("/frame/image").content
with_manage = client.get("/frame/image?manage=1").content
assert len(with_manage) == EXPECTED_BYTES
assert with_manage != plain # the manage-QR overlay actually got composited in
def test_two_widget_frame_composites_both_and_next_targets_calendar(client, db_session, monkeypatch):
"""A second frame (not frame #1) with two independent widgets -- a
calendar widget and a photo widget, addressed directly the way the
migration's calendar_photo_inlay backfill shapes a frame -- exercised
end to end over HTTP, not just via the migration's own unit tests."""
_mock_immich(monkeypatch)
frame = Frame(
name="Two Widget Frame", device_id="aabbccddeeff", device_token="devtok-2",
manage_token="mtok-2", orientation="landscape", created_at=time.time(),
)
db_session.add(frame)
db_session.flush()
cal_widget = Widget(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="calendar", x=0, y=0, w=4, h=5,
sort_order=0, created_at=time.time())
photo_widget = Widget(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos", x=4, y=0, w=4, h=5,
sort_order=1, created_at=time.time())
db_session.add_all([cal_widget, photo_widget])
db_session.flush()
db_session.add(CalendarWidgetConfig(widget_id=cal_widget.id, view="agenda", browse_offset=0))
db_session.add(PhotoWidgetConfig(widget_id=photo_widget.id, album_id="album-1"))
db_session.add_all([
FrameButtonAction(frame_id=frame.id, button="next", widget_id=cal_widget.id, action="advance"),
FrameButtonAction(frame_id=frame.id, button="back", widget_id=cal_widget.id, action="back"),
])
db_session.commit()
resp = client.get(f"/frame/image?id={frame.device_id}&token={frame.device_token}")
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
# NEXT is bound only to the calendar widget -- pressing it should
# move the calendar's browse_offset, not touch the photo widget.
resp = client.post(f"/frame/advance?id={frame.device_id}&token={frame.device_token}")
assert resp.status_code == 200
cal_cfg = db_session.get(CalendarWidgetConfig, cal_widget.id)
photo_cfg = db_session.get(PhotoWidgetConfig, photo_widget.id)
assert cal_cfg.browse_offset == 1
assert photo_cfg.current_asset_id == "" # untouched -- NEXT was never bound to it
def test_widgets_render_concurrently(client, db_session, monkeypatch):
"""Two independent, slow widgets on one frame should render in
roughly the time of the slowest one, not the sum -- the actual fix
for the "hold to cycle layouts times out and shows a false server-
failed status screen" bug: several network-backed widgets (photos,
weather, calendar) rendering one after another could push a single
/frame/* response past the firmware's fixed HTTP timeout even though
the server was simply still working."""
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "immich_client_for", lambda frame: object())
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "list_assets", lambda client, album_id: _ASSETS)
from PIL import Image
source = Image.new("RGB", (100, 80), (10, 20, 30))
def _slow_fetch(client, mode, asset_id):
time.sleep(0.25)
return source, None
monkeypatch.setattr(widgets.photos, "fetch_source_and_faces", _slow_fetch)
frame = Frame(
name="Concurrency Frame", device_id="112233445566", device_token="devtok-3",
manage_token="mtok-3", orientation="landscape", created_at=time.time(),
)
db_session.add(frame)
db_session.flush()
widget_a = Widget(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos", x=0, y=0, w=4, h=5,
sort_order=0, created_at=time.time())
widget_b = Widget(frame_id=frame.id, widget_type="photos", x=4, y=0, w=4, h=5,
sort_order=1, created_at=time.time())
db_session.add_all([widget_a, widget_b])
db_session.flush()
db_session.add(PhotoWidgetConfig(widget_id=widget_a.id, album_id="album-a"))
db_session.add(PhotoWidgetConfig(widget_id=widget_b.id, album_id="album-b"))
db_session.commit()
start = time.monotonic()
resp = client.get(f"/frame/image?id={frame.device_id}&token={frame.device_token}")
elapsed = time.monotonic() - start
assert resp.status_code == 200
assert len(resp.content) == EXPECTED_BYTES
# Serial would be ~0.5s (2 x 0.25s); concurrent should land near 0.25s.
assert elapsed < 0.45, f"widgets rendered serially, not concurrently ({elapsed:.2f}s)"