05b417a29b27e1247821794dc912370875113e00
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Thomas Faour
|
b5c52004c8 |
Split the tasks feature out of the calendar widget into its own widget type
Task lists used to be a week-view-only sub-feature bolted onto calendar widgets (CalendarWidgetConfig.tasks_*), so a task list could only exist tied to a calendar's view and only inside its footprint. Tasks are now a standalone widget type (TaskWidgetConfig, app/widgets/tasks.py) that can be placed and sized independently, same as photos/calendar/ whiteboard -- no separate "enabled" flag either, since being on the grid at all is the on/off switch, matching every other widget type. Migration 17 creates task_widget_configs, extracts any existing calendar widget's configured task source into a new sibling tasks widget (auto-placed in open grid space, source dropped+logged if truly none is left), then drops calendar_widget_configs' now-dead tasks_* columns in the same migration -- this project's usual same-migration- drop convention. Also handles the rarer case of a database jumping straight from before the widget system existed to after this split in one boot, via the legacy Frame.calendar_tasks_* columns. Verified live in the browser at desktop and mobile widths: adding a Tasks widget, its own dialog (task-list source picker + preview), and confirming the calendar widget's dialog no longer mentions tasks at all. Full test suite (180 tests, including new coverage for the widget render/actions, the migration's data-extraction path, and the permission-boundary shape for tasks-source) passes. |
||
 tfaour
|
99069ba5fe |
Widget system Phase 3: calendar widgets become size-aware
calendar_render.py's _build_* functions now take a real target box and pick font sizes/margins from three discrete size tiers (nearest pixel-area fit) instead of always laying out at full panel size and resizing after the fact -- a calendar widget placed smaller than the full panel gets an actually-legible layout instead of shrunk text. Month view falls back to agenda below the smallest tier, where 7 columns can no longer stay readable. The old photo-inlay split (inlay_region/_content_region/_paste_inlay) is deleted along with it -- arbitrary widget placement already subsumes what a fixed half-panel split did, and every call site has passed photo_inlay=None since the Phase 2 cutover. Also adds HTTP-level test coverage for GET .../preview/calendar, which had none before this -- it's what caught a stale photo_inlay kwarg left over from the _build signature change that would have TypeError'd on every request. |
||
|
tfaour
|
37bd657299 |
Widget system Phase 2: full cutover to widget-based rendering
device.py's mode-keyed dispatch is replaced by a real compositor: load a frame's widgets, compute pixel rects via app/grid.py, render each through its widget module, and composite with render_panel. Physical NEXT/BACK buttons now execute each frame's assigned FrameButtonAction rows instead of one hardcoded per-mode action. api_frames.py, manage.py, and common.py's build_manage_content are repointed to read/write the frame's widget config rows instead of the old Frame columns, and every settings page (Photos/Calendar/ Whiteboard tabs) now pre-fills its form from the same widget config the write endpoints actually save to -- previously the read and write sides would have silently diverged. The old mode selector and photo-inlay checkbox are removed along with their now-inert wiring; arbitrary widget placement subsumes what the fixed inlay split did. Ships together with Phase 1 (per-type render/action modules) since splitting the read/write cutover across deploys would have left settings changes with no visible effect. |
||
|
tfaour
|
f48daa71c8 |
Widget system Phase 1: per-type render/action modules
New app/widgets/ package (photos.py, calendar.py, whiteboard.py, plus the WIDGET_TYPES registry) -- the widget-system analogue of routers/device.py's old RENDERERS/ADVANCE_RENDERERS/BACK_RENDERERS, generalized from "one mode owns the whole panel" to "each widget renders into its own region and responds to named button actions." Each module exposes render(db, frame, widget, target_w, target_h) -> Image.Image (never raises -- a widget's own fetch hiccup falls back to a small placeholder rather than taking the whole panel's render down) and an ACTIONS registry for NEXT/BACK button assignment. Supporting changes needed to give the widget modules something to call, all mechanical/behavior-preserving for every existing caller: - image_pipeline.py: render_panel(regions, ...) generalizes render_frame's tail (paste, enhance once, overlay once, quantize once, pack once) from one photo to N regions -- not a restructuring, since calendar mode's photo-inlay feature already pastes a second composed image onto the canvas before that single shared pipeline runs. - photo_queue.py: advance_forced/back_forced/remove_from_rotation/ get_current take an explicit `frame` param now that `cfg` won't always be the Frame itself once photo-queue state moves to PhotoWidgetConfig -- caught a real latent bug while doing this: get_current was reading refresh_interval_s off `cfg`, but that's a frame-level wake-cadence setting, not something that becomes per-widget, so it now reads that off `frame` explicitly instead. - routers/common.py: list_assets/fetch_source_and_faces take album_id/ display_mode directly instead of a whole Frame (both only ever read that one attribute off it); new get_or_refresh_*_for_widget siblings of the existing calendar/weather/tasks/whiteboard cache helpers, read/ writing the new per-widget config tables -- the Frame-scoped originals are untouched and still what routers/device.py's actual dispatch calls until the Phase 2 cutover. 26 new tests (95 total): render_panel size/placement/orientation coverage, and per-widget-type render/action tests (unconfigured -> placeholder, a fetch failure -> placeholder not a crash, actions mutate the right state). Full suite passes; diff-reviewed to confirm device.py's actual RENDERERS dispatch and the old Frame-scoped get_or_refresh_* bodies are unchanged, so this is safe to deploy on its own despite being step 1 of a two-step cutover (see the project plan on why the *next* step, not this one, has to ship atomically). |